BAD WITH MONEY PANOPLY HOW TO
BAD WITH MONEY PANOPLY MOVIE

BAD WITH MONEY PANOPLY HOW TO

She speaks directly to her audience, offering advice on how to make that #freelancelyfe work for you, navigate money while you date, and budget without becoming a Nobel-winning economist overnight.Įven a topic as notoriously dry as money becomes hilarious and engaging in the hands of Dunn, who weaves her own stories with the perspectives of various comedians, artists, students, and more, arguing that-even without selling our bodies to science or suffering the indignity of snobby thrift shop buyers-we can all start taking control of our financial futures.

In Bad With Money, she reveals the legitimate, systemic reasons behind our feeling of helplessness when it comes to personal finance, demystifying the many signposts on the road to getting our financial sh*t together, like how to choose an insurance plan or buy a car, sign up for a credit card or take out student loans. And therein lies the problem.ĭunn argues that our inability to speak honestly about money is our #1 barrier to understanding it, leading us to feel alone, ashamed and anxious, which in turns makes us feel even more overwhelmed by it. “That’s a very personal question,” they insisted. Then, she asked how much money was in their bank accounts. In the first episode of her “Bad With Money” podcast, Gaby Dunn asked patrons at a coffee shop two questions: First, what’s your favorite sex position? Everyone was game to answer, even the barista. The beloved writer-comedian expands on her popular podcast with an engaging and empowering financial literacy book for Millennials and Gen Z. Dunn makes facing money issues seem not only palatable but possibly even fun.Dunn’s book delivers.” - Publishers Weekly It's just so unfair otherwise.“Humorous and forthright. watch this movie, then come back here and let's raise this puppy up. It is worth it! Come on! There are MUCH worse Hollywood crapbusters that don't get slammed this way. Please, grab some popcorn, flush your mind of preconceptions and give this Chilean quirkfest a try. it may not be a 7 for some, but it certainly deserves more than what it has. I am, however, judging this movie's entertainment value when compared to other movies such as this.

BAD WITH MONEY PANOPLY MOVIE

I am giving this movie a 7 stars rating - I am not comparing this to Citizen Kane, people. I found the story to be quite different, the special effects to be quite decent and sometimes, great (except for the last five minutes!!! I think they may have run out of money or something) and the acting is superb. To claim that Santos is derivative without saying what it derives from is also a weak argument.

not that the reviewers above ALWAYS lack imagination, but maybe on that day, their imagination had been sucked by an alternative universe. I agree that the editing should have been sharper (throughout! See, I am honest), and that the movie could have been a tad shorter but to say that the story made no sense just shows a lack of imagination and/or a lack of trying. HOW can this movie be given so low a rating, when Kick-Ass (one of my favorite super hero movies - and much grosser in parts) has almost an 8 star rating? And the acting on Spy Kids. actually, make that 'SHOULD have been cut.' But who cares? Is bad editing enough for such a low rating? So what, the guy snorted some crap. Although you can tell that someone on editing 'loved' it a little too much, cause quite a bit of the movie could have been cut. I am not saying I loved the movie, but the story. The story is unique! Different creative, weird. I hate to compare apples to Spy Kid, but really, the acting beats most movies in a similar genre. But the acting in Santos is really good! I mean, REALLY good.

Nah, I'd probably give those a three star for effort. Or, OK, I could give one star to those class C dragon slayer movies, where the dragon is a little puppet, the fire is clearly coming from a blowtorch, the castle is made of papier mache and the acting is all done by yelling and extreme facial contortion. I may be inclined to give this to one of those slasher movies, where you spend half the movie yelling at the screen 'DON'T GO THERE!!!' You know, those movies where you can tell the actors are super stupid, as if the casting was done over a weekend, on one of those Orange Julius tables across from the GAP.

Now, I am just shocked! How could these two guys give Santos one star only? I would reserve that to movies which truly sin against my senses - and that would have to be a TRULY awful movie, to deserve such a low rating. I just finished watching Santos, and was curious as to what rating it would have on IMDb, as the rating on Netflix was less than three stars.

Bad with money panoply